So this past week all the bloggers of colour have been writing to all the other bloggers of other colour but since they do not know each other personally [maybe the main problem?] they are simply sticking them on their blog for mostly people of their own colour to read and cheer and like and comment on… although every now and then a person of the other colour stumbles upon it and makes themselves known…
ALL THE WHITE PEOPLES
It started with this piece by Ntsiki Mazwai titled Dear White South Africans where the word ‘dear’ was clearly chosen only for its letter-beginning properties. If you have not read it yet then please go and do so before continuing [and if you want perhaps greater insight, take some time reading the comments and be very sure that this is not only one person’s opinion]. The gist of it is a response to all the white South Africans changing the idea of Heritage Day to Braai Day and begins with this very all-inclusive broad-swept statement:
Owing to this concept of Braai Day, I am forced to have this honest and somewhat uncomfortable conversation with you. I had hoped that since you have grown white people, they would teach you better…but they have not.
If the opening sentence is not directive enough of where this piece might go, the next paragraph throws off the gloves completely and no holds are barred as we are reminded that as white people we are descendants of such fun folks as Hitler and friends:
Let’s start at the beginning……my dear white people, you are not descendants of this land called Afrika. Afrika has its own children that it has birthed and nurtures.
It is written in the history books (which your people wrote) that you came from Holland, France, Britain, Spain…..all these are European countries.
The moral of the story is….You are descendants of Europe.
You are the children of Elizabeth, Hitler, Bismarck and others that built their legacy on stealing lands and making people slaves.
And so on, with lots of mention of ‘You white people’ [as in all of us, of course] and the fact that it was only black people who were responsible for the end of apartheid [really interesting when you take a look at her ‘Dear ANC Open Letter’ where she makes it clear that ‘There were many political parties who liberated us…a fact you like to blatantly ignore.’ in fact, i really enjoyed that post of hers much more than this one so give it a read]
While there may be a lot of truth in some of the things Ntsiki writes, she loses a lot of integrity by her continual blatant use of sweeping generalisation:
When you white people speak to a group of black people why do you speak ‘stupid’ English? That thing where you talk down to black workers makes you look stupid.
So absolutely, when that happens it is an abomination of racism and should be stopped. But it is not all white people and if she had given her piece a more balanced tone, i think it would have carried greater weight.
Possibly the strongest part of her piece for me was when she signed off with the words, Your rainbow nations counterparts, especially when i googled the word for full definition and saw adjectives like ‘equivalent’, ‘complement, ‘coequal’ and ‘fellow brother or sister’ as the descriptors.
There is definitely value in reading what she says and understanding this is how she feels and in going through the comments and knowing she is not alone in voicing it. We need to be aware of these voices and not just toss them aside because we disagree with everything they are saying or how it might come across.
A RESPONSE
Next up i read this blog by someone who calls himself Paul ‘or Juby or Jubez or Jubalizer or Jabualani or whatever you prefer.’ [i suspect that the ‘whatever you prefer’ bit is why he keeps having so many names!] titled ‘A response to “Dear White South Africans”‘ which surprisingly ended up being a response to the above blog post [who would’ve thought with such a deceptive title?]. Again, if you have not read this piece, do yourself a favour and go read the whole thing – this is just a summary of some parts that stood out to me:
Paul addresses Ntsiki directly by starting off with a description or explanation of who he is:
I have read your post and given it much consideration. I should perhaps start by saying that I am a white male who was born and raised in Durban. My heritage is non-Afrikaans, but I am not sure that that makes me ‘English’. I am however English speaking. There are a few issues raised that I would like to share my view on.
It is true that that I am of European descent. My ancestors (mostly in 1820) arrived in South Africa and committed atrocities against black people; enslavement, Apartheid, etc. I was born in the early 1990’s into a privileged life. I will never be able to understand fully what the people of this country went through, the oppression and the humiliation. You will always have my sympathies for what happened.
And then goes on to address specific points she has made. What i liked about Paul’s piece is that it felt quite gracious and humilitous [it’s a word!] in its response where it could quite easily have come across as knee-jerk responsive as Ntsiki’s did to me. And he describes his identity in a way which i really strongly identify with myself:
I would like to talk about identity. I believe that I am African. I might not be black by my family has lived here for 200 years. I have been to Europe and certainly do not consider myself European. African identity is not a matter of race, it’s a matter of culture. I am a South African because my culture exists nowhere else. It is what makes me who I am. It is my home.
A clever look back into the past extending the argument of why white South Africans should be referred to as ‘European’ into one looking at where the Zulu and Xhosa tribes moved in from, leads him to this witty and apt conclusion: Calling me one of the children of Hitler is like calling you a child of Charles Taylor, this is simply wrong. I could go on endlessly with such arguments. Ultimately, we are South African as our culture exists nowhere else.
Paul gives an understanding of how he sees Heritage day from the point of view of being more inclusive for each person to be able to celebrate their heritage. He also invites the idea of Heritage day being a day of sharing cultures and celebrating the differences in each other.
And Paul’s ending is also a really strong one: My fellow South African
Maybe we should just be focusing on the last lines of these posts and work from there…
ALL THE BLACK PEOPLES
Over on ‘To Muse and Abuse’, Matthew de Klerk responded with his piece titled, ‘Dear Black Bloggers [A Response to Dear White South Africans]’ which i would also highly recommend that you read.
i have to assume the title is a typo as his post seems to be a direct response to Ntsiki and i don’t think he is doing the same thing of generalising that all black bloggers need to hear this stuff, but maybe he opened it up as a response to the many people that were commenting on her blog in agreement as well?
While similiar in content to Paul’s piece, Matthew’s piece does tend to head to more emotional extremes as can be evidenced in his opening:
Emotion can be a dangerous thing. Sure, anger can lend to our words and actions a passionate intensity that enables a vociferous, unbidden expression of what we’re feeling at the time, but it also brings with it a dangerous cloud of obscurity to our thoughts, a choking fog that surmounts clarity and seeps in at the cracks of our rhetoric and renders it illogical, irrational.
Which is why when I read a Facebook-furore piece yesterday entitled “Dear White South Africans” , I was unsurprised to see what can only be described as dangerous, illogical generalisations at play in the form of that ever-emotional issue, race.
There are differences though, as Matthew agrees with Ntsiki that the concept of ‘Braai Day’ which he refers to as ‘a capitalist, consumerist and shallow hijacking of a public holiday’ is not something he is a fan of and has actually written other posts against.
i found this post quite interesting as there is the misdirection of this teaser:
Now then, to the issue at hand: it would be easy to call Mazwai’s blog post a baseless, moronic, stereotyping, hate-mongering mess of oversimplified sweeping generalisations and unfounded accusations, but in lieu of an ad hominem attack, I feel it is better to debunk the article on its own merits and bases.
Followed by a direct dealing and picking apart of Ntsiki’s various points with regards to points like ‘original heritages and countries of origin’ and ‘stealing lands and making people slaves’ by panning the camera out a little and showing how if you take a far enough back look, you will find that everyone is pretty much guilty of the same kind of thing.
i really liked the thinking behind this paragraph on ‘multiple contrasting heritages’:
The idea of having multiple contrasting heritages is also not made on logical ground. Yes, technically white people may or may not come from countries where they were the “children” (not literally, obviously) of “Elizabeth, Hitler, Bismarck”, but what of those living in the diaspora, those who were born in countries outside their so-called “homes”? I am ineligible for citizenship in my “homelands” Scotland, France and Britain (so much for being the son of Napoleon and Louis XI, right?), was born in Zimbabwe but have South African citizenship – how then, does my belonging here be erased because a bunch of unrelated humans came before me? In the same light, there are many aspects of these ‘bad’ legacies that can be celebrated: Nazis pioneered rocket engines, Uganda wants to kill gays, and the industrial revolution was thanks mostly to the Scottish people. Any Heritage comes with good and bad: if you chose to celebrate Shaka Zulu’s legacy, you would also have to accept his dark, violent, warmongering side instead of just sanitising his historical image as a faultless black Jesus.
Who tells the story and how we tell it generally has the hugest affect and persuasion on exactly what kind of story is being told. As opposed to necessarily what actually happened.
Matthew makes some strong points debunking ‘facts’ and ‘claims’ that Ntsiki makes, demonstrating them to rather be ‘opinions’, but sadly this is where his emotion starts to take over and what might be well thought-out arguments loses some credibility and likely audience, through the use of descriptors such as ‘weasel-wording-y’ and ‘a magnitude of imbecility that defies description’. Point made, audience lost perhaps. Especially those who already approached the post from an antagonistic stance.
So, some really good points to be made and read and understood, but also some emotional language to avoid so as not to lose all the good. Matthew might have led us to believe that he was going to debunk the article on its own merits and bases, which he does a lot of, but he can’t resists flinging a final piece of emotionalism to close off his piece.
In short conclusion, this article is nothing but a condescending, patronising, baseless bunch of unfounded opinions and childish assumptions that lead up to grotesque mess of hatemongering drivel. The author should, in future, not be so clinically myopic or as viciously race-hate hungry.
MY THOUGHTS
As someone who has been living in Americaland for the last three years [and been paying careful attention to a lot of the goings on over there with cases like Trayvon Martin and the Ferguson shootings and more] i am pretty convinced that i am not the best person to be speaking into the race/reconciliation/diversity conversations that are so necessary in South Africa, which is why the majority of the posts in the ‘Race’ section of my Taboo Topics’ space on my blog have been written by other people so far, and why a lot of my thought on ‘White Privilege’ were informed by the situations around us in Americaland.
What i DO believe though is that these blog posts are important – all three of them – and maybe even more important is to read the comments and try and hear the heart and tone and conviction behind the comments [difficult online, i know] on each of these posts as that is often where you find the heartbeat of the people as opposed to one person’s ideas or thoughts. If 2000 people are liking and sharing Ntsiki’s post [i don’t know if that’s the number – might be more, might be less] then we can’t simply dismiss it as ‘one person’s opinion’ and if it is our friends who are the ones sharing it, then that seems like a great point of connection for good healthy conversation.
And that we REALLY need to be talking about this stuff. Apartheid as an official thing might be dead but its roots are very much alive and unless we keep on cutting them off when they appear, or doing the hard difficult, maybe even dangerous work of digging under the ground to remove them completely, things will not change.
I’m leave you with some thoughts and a response from my new friend Ambu Madilonga [well almost friends, he hasn’t accepted my request yet on Facebook] who posted this to Ntsiki on Facebook, which i think contains a lot of generous Truth:
Molo Sisi…
I’m a SOWETAN (born and raised, in the 80s), a son to political activists (one of them being a veteran in the ANC, SACP& SANCO) and am Venda/Tswana.
I have to say I shared your post on Facebook because it is thought provoking and would like people I’m friends with to engage with such thinking.
Your posts suggests,I think, that you are a great person who is very passionate about her South Afrika and her people. But it also suggests that you are upset with certain people and issues in our beloved country. Now, when you express issues from a place of anger, you need to be careful that you don’t overshadow the good points you are trying to put across with emotion filled statements.
Although I agree with certain things here, I must say that some points here were made without any research and make you seem very impulsive (don’t mean to judge, sorry if it comes across that way).
Yes, Some white South Africans still undermine Black South Africans.
Yes, Some white South Africans still think Black South Africans are dumb.
Yes, Some white South Africans still think they are superior to black South Africans.
Yes, Some white South Africans still don’t wanna engage/interact with Black South Africans.
Oh and yes we all must remember our heritage and not overshadow it with just braaing (Rev Tutu is going to kill me for saying this, because he was the spokesperson for National Braai Day in 2007)
And celebrating is going to be messy, I mean can imagine all cultures in SA celebrating their own heritage? But it would be a beautiful mess none the less.
But please..
NO, Let’s not kick anyone out of SA (unless they are here illegally and harming our people and land)
NO, Lets not remind anyone that they are the minority.
NO, Let’s not do what their forefathers did (Racism, Apartheid and Hate speech).
Rather…
Let’s teach them what their ForeFathers did not teach them, what we (black South Africans where taught by ours)
“If you want to make peace with your enemy, you have to work with your enemy. Then he becomes your partner.”
“If you talk to a man in a language he understands, that goes to his head. If you talk to him in his language, that goes to his heart.”
“If the ANC does to you what the Apartheid government did to you, then you must do to the ANC what you did to the Apartheid government.” -Mandela
BLACK AND WHITE South Africans HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY
– To make friends with each other
– To respect each other
– To learn from each other
– To lead together
– To forget the Crappy past and embrace the present and work for a good future for all.
All of this starts with people like you and I who are in strategic places or have circles of influence.
For example, I’m friends with both whites and blacks and so I teach blacks that some whites are not bad and I also teach whites that some blacks are not bad. Practically, I invite my white friends to SOWETO and take them on long drives and visits to the beloved township. There I teach them our history briefly, feed them our food and show them our places. I very gently suggest that they atleast one of the Black african lingos (like a white South African in KZN, i tell them to try zulu). I do the same with my black friends and family. I bring them to the suburbs to hang out with the whites.
Of course its easy to say what’s in our heads when offended but we need to be careful to not go public with those before we have processed them first.
Hats off to you for your bravery and speaking out. You are one of the people that we need to help this country be what it can be for all.
Ndo Livhuwa nga maanda
Be blessed.
Ambu.
Ps. to you who commented on this in a less than childish way… SIES!
[For more Race-related conversations from a number of different perspectives, head over here]
Why are blacks always undermined in all countries? If you look at the US for example or the UK, the percentage in proportion to the total population of blacks in jail is always higher than it should be. For example if there are 1000 people in an area, and 800 are white and 200 are black, and the jail has 50 people in it, you would expect there to be 10 blacks in the jail, and 40 whites. However you’ll see more than 10 blacks for example.
One could argue poverty or other issues and while these arguments have some merits, they fall short when you look at Europe or even the UK populations. South Africa has a very high proportion of blacks in jail (much higher than their percentage of the population).
Please can we go into the cause of this?
Hi Hermann, thankx for dropping by. An excellent book to read on the American perspective on Mass Incarceration is ‘The New Jim Crow’ by Michelle Alexander which is sadly only got partly through as i was reading a borrowed copy just before we left Americaland. It is systems and mentalities of racism and complex agendas that play a big role and is way bigger than i can comment sufficiently on in this space. But asking that question is vital and the answer is simply not ‘just because they are black’ as some would have us believe.
So when they are in jail because of murder, rape etc.. they are not black? These crimes are not poverty related such as theft or robbery.
i am not sure what the stats are for South Africa but having read a little bit and seen some for America i can say that if you look at why black young men of a specific age for the most part are filling up the jails, you will be able to join-the-dots quite simply and realise it is not a case of simply ‘the bad people go to jail and the good people stay out’ – a lot of the imprisonments were marijuana-related and white people caught with the same or worse had nothing done to them simply because of the colour of their skin [and sometimes because of their capacity to hire better lawyers] – take some time to read what i have written on ‘White Privilege’ -http://brettfish.wordpress.com/2014/09/03/im-not-sure-youre-against-that-thing-you-think-youre-against-white-privilege – and respond to those thoughts before i give you any more space on here. This blog is not going to be a platform for some of the kinds of unfounded statements you are making.
Speaking of research: Rushton’s controversial work came under attack within the scientific community for the quality of the research,[1] and allegations that it was racist.[2] From 2002 he was head of the Pioneer Fund, a research foundation accused of being racist.[3]
One of his many critics is the evolutionary biologist Joseph L. Graves, who has done extensive testing of the r/K selection theory with species of Drosophila flies. Graves argues that not only is r/K selection theory considered to be virtually useless when applied to human life history evolution, but Rushton does not apply the theory correctly, and displays a lack of understanding of evolutionary theory in general.[29] Graves also says that Rushton misrepresented the sources for the biological data he gathered in support of his hypothesis, and that much of his social science data was collected by dubious means.
Using a racist to back your racist claims does not make them any more racist – also with regards to my previous comments on IQ this is all a lot less relevant anyways. But it clearly makes you feel a little better about yourself.
Why is it always about “blacks”? Please explain that.
Why is what always about blacks? I don’t understand your question.
So you read half of one book and now you’re an expert? I’ve read hundreds on the subject.
Um, no i think i quite clearly have said that i’m not an expert. What i said though that even reading half of her book [i was unable to finish it at the time but hope to one day] was enough to know that it was not as #cough black and white as you seem to think. It is a really complex question that dates back hundreds of years in terms of the question of who has been in power and what they used it for and how that has led to the systems and the contexts that we have today.
Yes, whites were historically in power. Does that mean today we must be slaves to black people while they never seem to be able to play catch-up?
No, it means you clearly see no correlation [despite your hundreds of books read on the topic – try reading some books that maybe are written from a different perspective to your own?] between the people being in power and putting the systems in place that keep those under them in a place of less power and hold them there for generations to come, effectively putting them on the back foot and then making bold statements like yours about “Look how they don’t perform equally” etc
Perhaps take a look at the PANDORA’S BOX series of articles to better understand South Africa’s history. I don’t wish to debate here, but once you’ve read them and are better informed, please do a post on it and let us know your views:
http://mikesmithspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.de/2010/04/time-to-open-pandoras-apartheid-box.html
http://mikesmithspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.de/2010/04/opening-pandoras-apartheid-box-part-2.html
There are 36 articles. Quite a lot of reading, but essential reading if you wish to stir up race topics.
It is twenty years since the Berlin Wall fell and brought an end to the social experiment that was the East German Democratic Republic (GDR). It also rang the bell for Socialism in the rest of Eastern Europe such as Poland, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia and Hungary.
The experiment with Eastern Germany was to see if intelligent, hardworking and productive people could make theoretical Socialism work. After forty years it was declared a monumental failure, the same as the monumental failure of the USSR which lasted about 70 years.
It was clear by 1989 that White people are not very accommodating of Socialism…their human spirit is too strong. For Socialism to work, the people need to be natural Socialists. In other words they need to be dumb, lazy and non-materialistic in nature. That is why Socialism is so easily accepted and tolerated in Africa and mixed race societies of South America.
The differences in mindset and culture of Whites as opposed to Blacks are vast and mostly genetic.
When hunger hits you in the stomach, cold hits you between the shoulder blades and you see the suffering in the eyes of your family, as a White man you are spurred on to work and provide for yourself and your family…But with Blacks it is different. When Blacks feel the same hunger, cold, and suffering, they are spurred on to hold out the begging bowl or turn to crime. Black males will rather let the women and children do the begging, because it looks too much like work to them. Crime suits the behaviour of Black males more…and besides, crime comes natural to them. Blacks will even work harder trying to steal something than ever do an honest day’s work.
Where hard work comes natural to the White man, crime comes natural to the Black. Whites have been mainly capitalistic and materialistic for the last six thousand years. Whites traded amongst themselves and with other tribes, sometimes separated by vast bodies of water. This Capitalism and sense of self improvement that is inherent in the White spirit is absent in Blacks. When a White person gets a salary increase, a bonus or inheritance, he immediately spends it on improving himself and his life…even if it seems like wasting the money. The Whites will buy new clothes, new furniture, new car,…all to improve his condition and that of his family…but not Blacks.
Blacks have lived for thousands of years in grass huts with very little luxury. They slept on the floor for thousands of years and never had beds…neither did they ever have electricity or running water. No toilets, no bath, no dug-out canoes or wheels for wagons to trade with…but they were happy. Even today, when Blacks migrate to the Western cities, they set up slums and shanty towns…again with no electricity, running water or toilets…and they are happy. They have no interest to advance themselves or their societies through hard work and crime is to them a means of satisfying their need for instant gratification, not to accumulate wealth or own property.
When one gives these blacks a salary increase or a donation of money, the money is not spent on improving themselves or their environment at all. All Blacks do is spending it on alcohol, drugs and other instant gratifications. When a Black man works in the garden of a White man for instance, it does not matter how much he is paid… R80 or R120, he will give R20 to his wife for food … and he will drink and smoke out the rest. The more money you give Blacks, the more you compound the problem. Just like feeding wild animals…when one feeds them, they lose their natural ability to forage for food.
Socialism could not work with Whites, because it is against everything that the White spirit is. Socialism takes away the individual’s right to freedom and to own property. Everything is shared…But if you do not own something, why should you bother maintaining it? At least why bother maintaining it alone when others are benefitting from it, but choose to park off in the sun the whole day? In the end everything is left to deteriorate…houses, infrastructure, farms and implements. A true “Tragedy of the Commons” in the way described by Garret Hardin. While private property creates incentives for conservation and the responsible use of property, public property encourages irresponsibility and waste. If everyone owns an asset, people act as if no one owns it. When no one owns it, no one really takes care of it. Public ownership encourages neglect and mismanagement.
You can travel in any community around the world and you will hear dogs barking, because even dogs understand property rights.
Socialism works for a short while, while it feeds like parasites on the wealth created by capitalism, but soon runs out of steam. Socialism is the same as a pyramid scheme…it shows some initial signs of success, but after that, socialism is a downward spiral that can only bankrupt a country in which everyone gets poorer. While it promises prosperity, equality, and security, it delivers only poverty, misery, and tyranny. Equality is achieved only in the sense that everyone is equal in his or her misery. Sir Winston Churchill said, “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
Socialists insist that in a country with abundant resources their system can work, but this is not true if we look at the evidence in history. No bounty of natural resources can ever compensate a country for its lack of an efficient system of incentives. Russia, for example, is one of the world’s wealthiest countries in terms of natural resources; it has some of the world’s largest reserves of oil, natural gas, diamonds, and gold. Its valuable farm land, lakes, rivers, and streams stretch across a land area that encompasses 11 time zones. Yet Russia remains poor. Africa is the richest continent when it comes to natural resources…Natural resources are helpful, but the ultimate resources of any country are the unlimited resources of its people–human resources.
Through their failure to foster, promote, and nurture the potential of their people through incentive-enhancing institutions, Socialist economies deprive the human spirit of full development. Socialism fails because it kills and destroys the human spirit.
Marxists further insist that the reasons for Socialist failures were, because the West always put embargoes on them and tried everything to subvert Socialism. Liberals also insist that Socialism is a wonderful idea but does not work so well in practice. That is obviously utter nonsense. When an idea is a good idea, one will see the results in the practical execution of it. If the practical execution is a failure, then the idea must also be a failure.
But Marxists are also very self critical and acknowledge the failures of the past such as Stalinism, failed economical policies and one party states as detailed in an article by Joe Slovo called, Has Socialism failed? .(1990)
In his article Slovo makes it clear that the ultimate goal for South Africa is Socialism with economic freedoms and multi party democracy as a necessary stepping stone to full blown Communism. Slovo uses examples from Socialist countries in eastern bloc countries that had more scientists and engineers than Western countries. He even mentions Cuba that has such a wonderful medical system that no country in the world can compare with it. As usual Slovo was a blind believer in Communism and outright liar.
Slovo fails to explain why hundreds of thousands of Cubans yearly flee their Socialist Utopia to the “evil” Capitalist America. Slovo fails to explain why people are fleeing Haiti and travelling almost 500 miles by ocean to get to the “evil capitalist empire” of Miami, USA when they are only 50 miles from the “workers’ paradise” of Cuba? Slovo further fails to explain why hundreds of thousands of people fled Socialist countries of Eastern Europe and why those countries had to impose travel restrictions on their people.
Why is it that Blacks were flocking from their own independent homelands into the evil White Apartheid neighbourhoods as well as facing lions and other wild animals through the Kruger Park on their way from Mozambique to the Capitalist cities of Johannesburg and Pretoria?
One can further ask why 25% of Whites in South Africa has fled the country of their birth in the last 15 years of ever increasing Socialism in South Africa. Fact is that Whites cannot stand living under the unfairness, the legalised theft and non reward of hard work of Socialism. Whites need incentives to work and when there are no incentives, Socialism introduces fear of death, fear of economical ruin, fear of joblessness and destitution as incentives…replacing the carrot with the stick.
Slovo raises an interesting point. He attacks critics of Socialism in Africa and points out that nobody mentions the failure of Capitalism in Africa…
As I have explained, Blacks are not natural Capitalist or idealists as Europeans. Blacks therefore never had money, banks or a Capitalist system to speak of. Therefore they never saw the need to improve themselves and build civilisations. Colonialism tried to introduce civilisation and Capitalism to Blacks and it failed.
Blacks enjoy an uncomplicated world and minimalistic lifestyle where they can exist from day to day. They had no long-term calendars and no forward planning. Farming methods were primitive and subsistent. Blacks prefer to receive instead of work and build. That is why they enjoy living under Socialism and Welfare Capitalism. Blacks are incapable of creating Capitalist societies and do not have the necessary entrepreneurial spirit needed for it.
From Gugulethu to Jamaica; from Kenya to New Orleans and from Trinidad to Detroit, wherever Blacks live, they are the same. In South Africa we have social grants for Blacks too and just like in other countries our Blacks abuse it. In Detroit in the USA, that has an 80% Black population and where the White population decreased by 93% the social welfare scamsters trade food stamps for alcohol, Viagra and porn movies, The staple diet of Blacks.
The ruins of Detroit…Where Whites were displaced by Blacks and Blacks are living on Social grants.
Socialism ultimately leads to ruin and should be stopped. The reality of life is that life is not easy, it never has been. If one does not want to study so that one can work hard and have a decent living, then one does not deserve a decent living. If one prefers to beg for an existence instead of work, then one must be satisfied with the life of a beggar. If one turns to crime to have what other (hardworking) people have, then one should expect to be imprisoned or killed.
When people are poor, benevolence and charity is a virtue, but Socialism is malevolent. Socialism is stealing from a few productive and hardworking citizens and giving it to the unproductive and lazy. Socialists call them the “rich” and the “poor” (bourgeoisie and proletariat) but frankly the so called “poor” remains poor no matter how much money they get, yet they always seem to have money for alcohol and drugs. The so called “poor” are also referred to as “The workers”, but nothing can be further from the truth, because the so called “Workers” never work. They live on free handouts. They should be called “The lazy and unproductive of society”. Socialism is not a “workers” paradise, but a dictatorship of the unproductive and lazy.
The Socialist Masters knows this, but this is how they get to power and stay in power for ever. Promise the “workers” free food, free money, free houses with free water and free electricity…in exchange for a measly vote every five years. How can capitalism compete with that? Who can offer a Black any better? Own businesses? Hard work? Studying? No, it is not the Black man’s thing. But the longer socialism continues, the more it consumes and eventually it is bankrupt and self destructs. In its wake it leaves behind total destruction, countless deaths and endless misery.
So if the choice for “instant gratification” Blacks is hardworking Capitalism as opposed to lazy Socialism, I can tell you that Socialism will always win. The intrinsic beliefs of Blacks are just too strong and it is genetic. One cannot get it out of them any less than one can get the concept of hard work and Capitalism into them.
The ultimate goal of the Marxist intellectuals of the world is worldwide Communism. They accept their failed experiments with intelligent Whites in the USSR and Eastern Europe. They further accept their failure to introduce Socialism in Capitalist Western societies. They acknowledge their successes in Black countries and in countries with mixed race populations such as South America and the darker races of South East Asia and China. The problem for the Marxists is the Whites who refuse to accept Socialism.
The solution is simple…They force multiculturalism and multiracialism upon White Western societies. Through mysogenation and race mixing the resistance of the White gene to Socialism will be broken down and turned into the acceptance of Socialism by a Multi-culti soup of a population and the rejection of Capitalism. Multiculturalism and multiracialism is force fed down the throats of Whites the world over by unscrupulous leftist-biased mainstream media, politicians and academics in their march towards a one world Communist dictatorship.
How can Whites stop this? Whites have no place to run to. Whites cannot isolate themselves on an island such as Australia when half of the Whites welcome these races in. Whites can try to re-colonise countries, but will soon bankrupt the mother countries when they try to sustain the colonies. Whites can try and educate Blacks and other darker races about the dangers of Socialism and the advantages of Capitalism, but in my opinion it is futile. Whites can sit and wait for a worldwide cataclysmic disaster or disease that will wipe out the competitive and parasitic races, but it might never come…The future for Whites is bleak…Doing nothing will lead to the extinction of the White race as we know it. Whites can start fighting back, but it will quickly escalate into a World War and I doubt it if Whites have the will. In the end it might be the only solution. Whites can pray for a solution, it might or might not help, but at least it is better than doing nothing. It is getting unbearable now.
Nope, turns out i was wrong. This is simply pure racism and you should probably take it somewhere else.
You are looking for attention, for debate on your blog by posting all these pieces. Now deal with it, or delete it if you cannot counter it.
i am looking for engagement and conversation and sure, creating space for debate as well, where it comes from the place of people up to wrestling for truth and not simply looking for a space to slap down their already decided agenda. When you can agree to that and be more open to learning and the possibility that your assumptions may not be correct, you are most welcome to be on here. If you’re not liking that, the internet is a big place and you are welcome to find some one-sided agreement elsewhere.
Hi Brett
Thank you for the feature and the analysis. I have recently contacted Matthew and it turns out we went to the same university, at the same time, for the same period of time (2010-2013). We actually lived within 5km of each other for 4 years and never met. We studied different subjects but it is interesting to see how life pans out.
What really blew my mind is that we both are living in France and have both moved here within the past month. At least we live 900km apart now.
That was my first attempt at writing anything of importance but I am happy it has been well received as a message of what it means to be an African. Thank you for the feature. I really appreciate it. If anything I have only been inspired to write more in the future.
Paul
PS. It was Rhodes University, Grahamstown.
Hey Paul, wow that is insane in terms of connection with Matthew. And both living in France? What are the chances that a random blogger in South Africa would connect those two dots.
Definitely look forward to hearing more from you so keep on. Thanks for stopping by.
love brett fish
You tend to use the phrase, “blown away” a lot. Every time I read it, I think of you being blown away like a feather – it implies that you are not very grounded. It sounds very cliched – used a lot by Christians. It may also have other meanings – lets not go there..
You use the word “intentional” a lot. Everything everyone does is intentional. By saying this, you imply that the rest of us act as zombies with no free will. If for example I spend R200 on a bottle of whiskey, it is my intention. If I give it to the poor, it is my intention. Everything we all do is always intentional so no need to mention it.
Please get those words out of your blog.
Hermann, you’re just being kinda annoying now and have shown your true colours some more [is that phrase allowed?] If you don’t like the words in my blog you are welcome to go back to the ones that say the things you want them to. For me ‘blown away’ means inspired or shocked or encouraged in an extreme way.
And when i use the word intentional i mean ‘with intent’ as in predetermined thought before action which is not how many people live in my experience of watching many people live. If you spend R200 on bottle of whiskey simply because that’s a habit of yours then i don’t see that as intentional, i see it as routine. Choosing decisively how you will use your money and then backing up that decision with action is how i see intentionality.
Language has changed my friend and so should you. And so should i. Hopefully towards better things and becoming better people.
Wow – I am blown away! Your intention to upset is clear! I almost mistook your shit-stirring for a “klip in die bos” as us Afrikaners like to say. But alas, now i see it is only to fool me into doing what I am doing now – give your destructive provocations some oxygen! But my reply’s opening line was just too tempting – I could not resist – You win! May blessings be yours and plentiful.
Regards
Thankx for visiting. Imagine a world where more of us were ‘blown away’ by more of life’s day to day things and people? However we choose to refer to it. I am totally not out to upset but i do sometimes like to give as good as i get which doesn’t tend to go well in the Trolling community… may your blessings be the same!
Hey Paul! Shout-out 🙂
I apologise, Brett, that I only get around to this now. The whole “Dear Black Bloggers” furore of 2014 (as I’m calling it) was terrifying and awesome and a totally new experience. You guessed correctly as to the title (i’ve made some alterations to the original post to clarify on certain ambiguities and questions as my (temporarily increased) readership brought them forward): It was intended to be a ‘reply’ rather than a poke at bloggers of a particular racial demographic.
My issue with this, er, issue, was that it blew up so quickly. You know, my blog is a more personal space dedicated to my first love, satirical news (i think like 90% of it is Onion-style news). It doesn’t get a lot of readers, but every now and then I spice it up with a serious post (harkening back to my Journalism and University days) to get a debate started.
Unfortunately, I forgot that race is such a heady topic in South Africa. I got some 18k views in basically a day or two. My last biggest post was maybe a thousand over the course of a week. 😐
But not all pageviews were created equal, and just as you’ve seen here on your own blog and comment section, even the most sincere of engagements with problematic topics can be skewed or exploited. It is a dark, troubling fear of mine that my message (namely, that “white” people is a misleading target, because it’s not monolithic, and it’s a hateful red herring that detracts from serious issues and ignores many of the historical facts and sociocultural complexities of this topic) was coopted by many, many readers just like those visiting and commenting on your site to justify why the original source post was stupid and wrong and why their bigoted, narrow-minded view is legitimate and factually correct. They read my post and, instead of seeing a call to a more empirically-based critique of the modern crisis of Heritage Day, they see “FUCK LOL BLACK PEOPLE ARE MONKEYS AND SAVAGES THEY OWNED SLAVES TOO ZOMG SCIENCE FACTS LONG LIVE THE NATS”.
But we as authors cannot exercise control over our work after it passes from out hands. We can only try to be level-headed and calm and hope that the rest of the world (or, rather, the 12 people who read our blog) see the sense and emulate it.
Thank you for the reblog and commentary.
regards,
Matt
Thanks Matt, wow you have 12 people reading your blog? I must work harder… ha ha no i appreciate you taking the time to stop by and comment and give some more explanation vibes – i used to write satirical pieces a long time ago and really enjoyed it but sometimes don’t think i have the knowledge needed to craft really great ones [the better you know and understand the topic you’re skewering, obviously the more helpful] so i stick to topics i am really passionate about [like race and reconciliation, taboo topics people rarely speak about and relationship vibes] and throw in the occasional satirical piece so maybe we’re like mirror images or complementians or something…
thankx for the encouragement and keep on
love brett fish
That comment was very difficult for me to read. I read it with my mouth hanging open involuntarily. This is the logic that Hitler and the Nazis used to try to wipe out the Jews and if you look at the contributions of Jewish people to society that is clearly proven wrong. What about ask of the successful black business people, actors, president if the usa (mixed race) whether our not you agree with his politics. What about Nelson Mandela? My response is not eloquent nor does it cite any research out authorities. I don’t often join in there debates but this one gutted me and I had to write something, but I have no words. ..
And I work in software and some of the best engineers I know are Indian. Half of our engineering staff in California is Indian and there are many successful consulting firms err use that are owned and operated by Indians in India. You can no more blanket dark skinned people this was than it is fair to say that all white skinned people today are racist, imperialIst oppressors simply based on the much of the history of racist imperialist oppression in the past 500 years being mostly by whites and westerners.
Oh my goodness! Incredible article dude! Many thanks, However I am going through
difficulties with your RSS. I don’t understand why I cannot
join it. Is there anyone else having identical RSS problems?
Anybody who knows the answer will you kindly
respond? Thanks!!
ah thankx you so much Laticia. Oh no, my RSS [i have no clue what that means, i am way too untech] but i should get someone to check it out, thanks for letting me know.
love b
Laticia, i spoke to my friend who has helped me a lot with this site and she is looking into it. Thanks a lot.
[…] Dear Bloggers of Undetermined Colour – Thoughts and reflections on some Heritage Day vs Braai Day posts… […]