Too often, it has been the arrival of the question that has instantly muted the conversation.
As i have sought to write [and invite others to] about topics such as Race and Reconciliation, the Church, Relationships and more, it has been disappointing to me how often a term [White Privilege] or phrase [We aren’t currently part of a local church congregation] or idea [No sex before marriage] has sent people scurrying off back to where people scurry to, before there has even been a chance to engage with why they disagree or think differently, and without them seizing the opportunity of looking at something they have a strong opinion on, from a different point of view.
christians tend, on occasion, to be even worse, often throwing out the line, ‘But the bible says so’ as if that phrase in itself is an adequate defence. They often don’t feel the need to back that up with where they believe the bible might be saying it is so, or being willing to engage in conversations on context and meaning within the wider story of the bible [misquoted or out-of-context single verses being typical to this kind of conversation].
AT THE VERY LEAST ASK THE QUESTION
i believe that is such a great start. Simply acknowledging that someone else thinks very differently on a matter than you do, and that it might be helpful to at least ask the question – What if they are right?
Especially if this is something you hold to strongly. If they are wrong and you are right, then asking the question and engaging a little bit more deeply on why they believe differently can only surely strengthen your belief and resolve.
Sometimes people run away from a conversation [or dive in and argue defensively] in which they have not even properly heard what the other person is really saying, and instead are responding to what they thought the person was saying. This calls for more listening and i started to address this last year in a series titled, I’m not sure you’re against that thing you think you’re against, where i looked at Rape Culture and White Privilege as two examples of this. Both of these are such important ongoing conversations to be having and yet so many people refuse to engage or come in swinging without really taking time to properly hear what the conversation is actually about.
i hope in 2015, at the very least, to discover ways to get more people to at least ask the questions – specifically in areas such as race, reconciliation and a unified South Africa; on what being a part of the church really means and how that can best be lived out; on the way men treat women in general and looking towards the hope that we can do better; and in areas of money, giving and poverty. Others may come up along the way, but those are some key areas to me right now, which i feel can use some attention.
One way to improve yourself in this area is to work on your listening. When someone is talking to you, do they have your full attention, or are you already working on your response to them? Take time to listen and then let your response follow.
A second way is to invite different voices to speak to you – we tend to listen [both in terms of who we read or follow online and in terms of who we invite to speak to us] to people who look largely like us [for me that would be christian, white, male, middle class men] and so diversify the information and the stories you take in. From using different news sources, to following bloggers of different race or culture, to reading books written by people with strongly different opinions than yours, start creating opportunities to listen well and maybe even learn. After all, if you only ever listen to voices you agree with, you are less likely to learn new things.
Let’s make 2015 a year of dipping our feet into the deep end and seeing what happens…
Good words. And I will engage as best I can. The problem with conversations like this is that they’re time-consuming … and when you already spend a whole lot of time at your computer, that can be hard. Then, sometimes I read something posted by a blogger and I want to respond with my own blog post, so I go and make a note to myself, complete with a link to the post in question. But to do the subject justice I have to think. And research. And be willing to engage meaningfully. And not be irritated and fed up if nobody wants to engage. This is why my blog tends to be intermittent bursts of random personal stuff that I hope someone will find funny. It’s easy to do that, you see – in between all the other stuff I have to do…:)
Which is why the idea of a meal conversation dedicated to world-changing conversations can be a healthy and transformative thing – whether you start with first Friday every month or end up at once a week, creating something that is part of your regular routine can be really helpful and make a big difference in the long run – especially if you can find the right people to invite around your table… i imagine it will be a bit hit and miss but well worth it in the end…
keep on
love brett fish
My experience of Americans is that they generally don’t care to “engage”, and they’re usually too busy for laid-back socializing. It was one of the hardest things to get used to when I moved here. But I do have two good friends who love a good, intense discussion over coffee, and one of them has started inviting a small group of women to her home for dinner and conversation every month. So it’s happening … although pretty much all we do is talk.
i think that may be true of a lot of Americans, but certainly not all of them – on bot coasts we found those willing to dive in deeply and engage, sometimes they just need a nudge or a space and maybe those dinner times with your friend will be it. Be expectant and take risks in terms of initiating important conversations and see what happens. Or take a chance and host your own coffee meeting or meal and see what happens. It might be with the one or two you mentioned and there may come a time when each of them have one other person who might be interested – certainly doesn’t have to be a big thing to be a good thing.
All the best
love brett fish
Courageous conversations. Yes. I like having these when both of us allow each other to have a different point of view.
I like having these where the aim is not for me to convert you to my way of thinking.
I like having these where the opposite sides of these conversations are not considered right or wrong, but two opinions; two view points out of many diffetent options.
I so like the idea of that not needing to convert thing but wonder how good i am at it practically… Also sometimes the way i come across might seem aggressive or unbudging when it is actually just passionate so definitely something i need to be mindful of.
Yes! I agree – I often wonder if the absolute passion that I have for a subject makes me seem intolerant and inflexible.